Saddam is Smart... As he plays the Left like a fiddle.

We know you are “reporting for duty”, but the question to the Left is “Who is YOUR Commander-in-Chief”?

C.I.R. Press Editorial

WASHINGTON, D.C. -- As new revelations come forward I know the left-wing will continue its denial of the entire danger called Iraq under the Saddam regime. Why is it so hard to understand that Saddam is smart, and of course I will be greeted with the quote of him saying “not from Iraq.” Of course not, the guy is psychotic but as I said smart. If he ordered forces of Iraq to attack the US, he is well aware that his country would be destroyed… Beyond recognition, and for the peace-nics, even more destroyed than it is now.

“If he had the WMDs why didn’t he use them?” If you think that question resolves any questions, and ends the debate, you are greatly mistaken. He speaks about the perfect set up would be: if attacked on the basis of WMDs that they would be hidden, then those against the war could be on his side. “The brave leader who was falsely attacked.” It was a very well played geo-political hand, but it only works because the Left and the media are unwilling to think that Saddam might have WMDs, and are unwilling to stand up behind words formed and signed in the United Nations. Either enforce it, or end it! The UN is a text book example of a SNAFU.

How many of you out there believe that the United States of America has nuclear weapons? How can you say that, I doubt you have ever seen a warhead with your own two eyes. You are willing to believe anything on the one side but when a country is violating UN #687 it is not possible and it is a fantasy of the right?

Saddam on Terrorism:
“what is it that we . . . consider this technique . . and use people involved with smuggling. . there were stories on smuggling.”

I will clear it up for you. Iraq sells or smuggles things to any given person in the world to attack US interests or the homeland. The job gets done, technically speaking not carried out by Saddam or his military. This sounds familiar. A lot like someone that enjoys telling people the best way to kill others, plans the event, but then sends others to do the real “work.” Why is it that people want to make this huge difference between Osama and Saddam. I am NOT saying they collaborated but I will not rule it out.

To top it off. Anyone that wishes to use Duelfer’s accounts of the SITREP in Iraq… When you make the argument there are no WMDs because he says so. Please include:

"A lot of materials left Iraq and went to Syria," Duelfer said. "There was certainly a lot of traffic across the border points. We've got a lot of data to support that, including people discussing it. But whether in fact in any of these trucks there was WMD-related materials, I cannot say."

I am sure they were just trucks of sand, oil, or … or …. or … COME ON! Wake up and smell the coffee.

In conclusion of this piece... I would agree with Saddam! He actually blows the lefts argument out of the water. Why is that? Because President Bush NEVER started this war (technically 41 did). For all those calling Bush a liar and saying he started an illegal war, he is only continuing the one started in early ‘90’s. Let Saddam tell you:

“So we have not lost the war. And we were not defeated. You know that the fighting that went on continued -- between us and Iran -- continued for eight years. Iran lost battles to us and we lost battles to them. But how do you calculate things? You measure things by the final results.”

President Bush did not start the war, he is finishing it. As the Right loves to say, the Left will be found on the wrong side of history.